After making up a false claim about a nonexistent study done by the AAAS, the AI software admitted that it made a mistake and then apologized.
The post Did ChatGPT Just Lie To Me? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Editors at The BMJ are lousy at predicting the citation performance of research papers. Or are they?
The post Editors can’t spot talent. I’ve heard this joke before. It isn’t funny appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Twitter does not increase citations, a reanalysis of author data shows. Did the authors p-hack their data?
The post Desperately Seeking (Statistical) Significance appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
When a reputable journal refuses to get involved with a questionable paper, science looks less like a self-correcting enterprise and more like a way to amass media attention.
The post Fill in the Blank Leads to More Citations appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Article Attention Scores for papers don’t seem to add up, leading one to question whether Altmetric data are valid, reliable, and reproducible.
The post Unpacking The Altmetric Black Box appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Can Clarivate deliver on a single, normalized measurement of citation impact or did its marketing department promise too much?
The post Journal Citation Indicator. Just Another Tool in Clarivate’s Metrics Toolbox? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.