web analytics
Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

About Open Science

(All that comes with it, (but not by itself)

About Open Science

Main menu

  • Home
  • Open Science at UMCG & RUG
  • Open Science Community Groningen
  • Data
  • About

Category Archives: oa.metadata

Post navigation

← Older posts

Why PID Strategies Are Having A Moment – And Why You Should Care – The Scholarly Kitchen

Posted on January 25, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

“Last year’s White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Nelson Memo is just one recent example of a national funding organization that is paying attention to PIDs. It directs US agencies to instruct their funded researchers “to obtain a digital persistent identifier … include it in published research outputs when available, and provide federal agencies with the metadata associated with all published research outputs they produce”. Other examples include UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) recently updated open access policy, which states that “Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) for articles must be implemented according to international recognised standards”; and Plan S’s requirement for the “Use of persistent identifiers (PIDs) for scholarly publications (with versioning, for example, in case of revisions), such as DOI”, which has been adopted by multiple countries.

It’s not just the national funders who are getting in on the act; there’s also been a surge in interest at the national government level. A number of countries in the Americas, Asia Pacific, and Europe are at various stages of developing and implementing national PID strategies. They include Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, Peru, South Korea, and the UK, all of which are participating in a Research Data Alliance (RDA) National PID Strategies Working Group, set up following a Birds of a Feather session at the RDA Virtual Plenary 17 last year. There are a number of similarities between these countries’ approaches, as the RDA WG has found. Its aim is “to map common activities across national agencies/efforts and produce a guide on the specific PIDs adopted in the context of national or regional PID strategies [in order to] help others, irrespective of geographical region, follow a blueprint to define their national PID approach. The intention is that it can be adopted or adapted by other countries looking to develop their own PID strategies. By following the recommendations it will encourage standardisation internationally.” One element of this work is to identify the most commonly used PIDs across all countries, which I’m sure is music to the ears of my former NISO colleague Todd Carpenter, who pointed out in his recent post that, “It is past time that we all agree on a core set of identifiers and basic metadata elements and begin to encourage researchers to use them at scale when communicating their results.” Common PIDs (not all of which are open) that have already been identified in the RDA WG’s work include: ORCID or ISNI for researchers; ROR or ISNI for research organizations; Crossref DOIs for research articles; DataCite DOIs or Handles for research data; Crossref DOIs for grants; RAiD for projects; and DOIs, IGSN and RRID for samples and specimens….”

Posted in oa.benefits, oa.dois, oa.interoperability, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.orcid, oa.pids, oa.ror, oa.standards, openaccess | Leave a reply

Call for Expressions of Interest – CARL Visiting Program Officer, Metadata & CARL Collaboration with OpenAIRE – Canadian Association of Research Libraries

Posted on January 19, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

“CARL invites applications for a Visiting Program Officer (VPO), Metadata & CARL Collaboration with OpenAIRE. The incumbent will work with the Canadian OpenAIRE Task Force to lead CARL’s ongoing collaboration with OpenAIRE, an international network that promotes and shares common practices, standards, protocols, and content towards a sustainable open global research ecosystem, and liaise with the Tri-Agency and the Canadian repository community on behalf of the Task Force.

The successful candidate will have expertise in metadata and repositories, the ability to work collaboratively as part of a team, and strong organizational and communication skills. The ability to work in both English and French would be an asset. The position will entail working for CARL for the equivalent of one day per week, for a period of at least one year. The deadline to apply is February 15, 11:59 p.m. Eastern….”

Posted in oa.canada, oa.carl, oa.jobs, oa.libraries, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.openaire, oa.volunteers, openaccess | Leave a reply

Building the Open Global Data Citation Corpus | Feb 13, 2023 | Webinar Registration – Zoom

Posted on January 19, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

“Wellcome Trust and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Partners with DataCite to Build the Open Global Data Citation Corpus Aggregated references to data across outputs will help the community monitor impact, inform future funding, and improve the dissemination of research DataCite is pleased to announce that The Wellcome Trust has awarded funds to build the Open Global Data Citation Corpus to dramatically transform the data citation landscape. The corpus will store asserted data citations from a diverse set of sources and can be used by any community stakeholder. Interested community stakeholders are invited to join the virtual kick-off and participate in a conversation between DataCite, Wellcome Trust, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, EMBL-EBI, COKI, OpenAIRE, and OpenCitations. The slides and recording will be shared afterwards through the DataCite Zenodo Community and YouTube Channel, respectively….”

Posted in oa.citations, oa.data, oa.datacite, oa.events, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.ogdc, openaccess | Leave a reply

Measuring Metadata Impacts: Books Discoverability in Google Scholar – The Scholarly Kitchen

Posted on January 17, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

“The scholarly publishing community talks a LOT about metadata and the need for high-quality, interoperable, and machine-readable descriptors of the content we disseminate. However, as we’ve reflected on previously in the Kitchen, despite well-established information standards (e.g., persistent identifiers), our industry lacks a shared framework to measure the value and impact of the metadata we produce.

In 2021, we embarked on a Crossref-sponsored study designed to measure how metadata impacts end-user experiences and contributes to the successful discovery of academic and research literature via the mainstream web. Specifically, we set out to learn if scholarly books with DOIs (and associated metadata) were more easily found in Google Scholar than those without DOIs.

Initial results indicated that DOIs have an indirect influence on the discoverability of scholarly books in Google Scholar — however, we found no direct linkage between book DOIs and the quality of Google Scholar indexing or users’ ability to access the full text via search-result links. Although Google Scholar claims to not use DOI metadata in its search index, the results of our mixed-methods study of 100+ books (from 20 publishers) demonstrate that books with DOIs are generally more discoverable than those without DOIs….”

Posted in oa.books, oa.crossref, oa.discoverability, oa.dois, oa.google_scholar, oa.impact, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.search, openaccess | Leave a reply

Wellcome Trust and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Partner with DataCite to Build the Open Global Data Citation Corpus – DataCite Blog

Posted on January 17, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

“DataCite is pleased to announce that The Wellcome Trust has awarded funds to build the Open Global Data Citation Corpus to dramatically transform the data citation landscape. The corpus will store asserted data citations from a diverse set of sources and can be used by any community stakeholder.

The Make Data Count (MDC) initiative was established in 2014 to develop an infrastructure for open data metrics. A key learning from the initiative is that the community needs a clear understanding of data reuse to monitor impact, inform future funding, and improve the dissemination of research. The development of a trusted central aggregate of all references to research data across articles, preprints, government documents, and other outputs will help achieve this goal….”

Posted in oa.citations, oa.copyright, oa.czi, oa.data, oa.datacite, oa.dois, oa.funders, oa.infrastructure, oa.mdc, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.ogdc, oa.pd, oa.pids, oa.wellcome, openaccess | Leave a reply

OpenAlex documentation improvements | OurResearch blog, January 3, 2023

Posted on January 9, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

“It’s a new year and at OurResearch we’re starting off 2023 full steam ahead! We’ve revamped the OpenAlex documentation so that it’s easier to get started, and easier to find the fields and filters that are available in the OpenAlex API. It should take less “clicks” to find what you need. Poised for growth The major change we made was to highlight the core entities (works, authors, etc) in OpenAlex, giving them their own up-front space. OpenAlex grew considerably in 2022, not only in number records, but also by the number of ways that you can filter, group, and search scholarly data. This new approach provides more room to add and document filters. We can better describe the unique search capabilities available in each entity. Overall, it sets us up to grow again in 2023….”

Posted in oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.openalex, openaccess | Leave a reply

Enriching the scholarly metadata commons with citation metadata and spatio-temporal metadata to support responsible research assessment and research discovery

Posted on January 6, 2023 by OATP primary
Reply

Abstract:  In this article, we focus on the importance of open research information as the foundation for transparent and responsible research assessment and discovery of research outputs. We introduce work in which we support the open research information commons by enabling, in particular, independent and small Open Access journals to provide metadata to several open data hubs (Open Citations, Wikidata, Open Research Knowledge Graph). In this context, we present The OPTIMETA Way, a means to integrate metadata collection, enrichment, and distribution in an effective and quality-ensured way that enables uptake even amongst small scholar-led publication venues. We have designed an implementation strategy for this approach in the form of two plugins for the most widely used journal publishing software, Open Journal Systems (OJS). These plugins collect, enrich, and automatically deliver citation metadata and spatio-temporal metadata for articles. Our contribution to research assessment and discovery with linked open bibliographic data is threefold. First, we enlarge the open research information data pool by advocating for the collection of enriched, user-validated metadata at the time of publication through open APIs. Second, we integrate data platforms and journals currently not included in the standard scientometric practices because of their language or lack of support from big publishing houses. Third, we allow new use cases based on location and temporal metadata that go beyond commonly used discovery features, specifically, the assessment of research activities using spatial coverage and new transdisciplinary connections between research outputs.

 

Posted in oa.assessment, oa.commons, oa.discoverability, oa.gold, oa.journals, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.ojs, oa.open_citations, oa.optimeta, oa.orkg, oa.platforms, oa.tools, oa.wikidata, openaccess | Leave a reply

Mayernik | The Role of Metadata and Vocabulary Standards in Enabling Scientific Data Interoperability: A Study of Earth System Science Data Facilities | Journal of eScience Librarianship

Posted on December 30, 2022 by OATP primary
Reply

Abstract:  Objective: Journal publishers within many sciences are increasingly expecting data to be deposited into repositories that support the FAIR principles. Data repositories are thus needing to determine what implications the FAIR principles have on their existing services and systems. Metadata standards and controlled vocabularies are specifically called out as core components of the FAIR principles related to interoperability.

Methods: This paper looks specifically at the ways that metadata standards and controlled vocabularies are used by Earth system science data repositories. Data sets from 55 data facilities were examined to determine which metadata standards and controlled subject / keyword vocabularies were used. 

Results: The findings indicate that only the ISO 19115:2003 and DataCite metadata standards are used by more than 40% of the data facilities, and the NASA Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) keywords are the only keyword vocabulary of broad use within this community. 

Conclusions: These findings raise questions about the extent to which metadata standards and keyword vocabularies can facilitate interoperability beyond narrow sub-sections of the data facility communities. This study also points to systematic challenges related to migration to new standards.

Posted in oa.data, oa.fair, oa.geo, oa.interoperability, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.ontologies, oa.repositories, oa.repositories.data, oa.standards, oa.vocabularies, openaccess | Leave a reply

The State of Journal Production and Access 2022: Report on survey of independent academic publishers

Posted on December 22, 2022 by OATP primary
Reply

“Among the main findings on the topic of journal production were:

• Compared to 2020, there was apparent growth in journals producing HTML articles.

• Full-text XML article production remained flat since 2020 (38% in 2020 and 2022).

• 50%+ respondents included ORCIDs and DOIs in metadata, but other PIDs like author/ contributor roles, funder IDs, and organizational IDs had lower adoption rates. That said, some PIDs increased across the two surveys, including Funder ID (20% in 2022 versus 16% in 2020) and CRediT (22% in 2022 versus 16% in 2020).

• Most respondents said PDF and HTML are the most important article formats for their readers, as well as reaching publishing program goals.

• When asked to rate their publishers’ primary production goals, most respondents chose “journal/article search engine optimization” (86% reported that this was “very” or “somewhat” important).

Among the main findings on the topic of journal access were:

• 95% of respondents said at least one of their publisher’s journals offered OA options.

• 80% of respondents said their organization utilizes fully-OA publishing models.

• When asked to rate their publishers’ primary funding/revenue priorities, most respondents chose “identifying viable funding model(s) for publishing one or more fully-OA journals” (68% reported it’s “very” or “somewhat” important).

• Institutional subsidies and grants were seen as having the highest OA funding potential…”

Posted in oa.business_models, oa.comparisons, oa.formats, oa.gold, oa.journals, oa.metadata, oa.monitoring, oa.new, oa.orcid, oa.pids, oa.publishers, oa.reports, oa.scholastica, oa.search, oa.surveys, openaccess | Leave a reply

The State of Journal Production and Access 2022: Report on survey of independent academic publishers

Posted on December 22, 2022 by OATP primary
Reply

“For independent academic publishers, the digital landscape presents many new opportunities to expand the reach and influence of research along with new challenges — often at the intersection of article production and access. Publishers are weighing evolving content formatting and metadata standards as well as open access (OA) mandates, which increasingly go hand in hand and can directly affect journal discoverability and impact.

The 2022 “State of Journal Production and Access” report details the results of a global, cross-disciplinary survey of scholarly society, university, and research institution publishers about how they are approaching journal production and access now and in the future, spanning:

Article production processes and formats
Metadata tagging standards and approaches
OA journal development plans and funding models

The goal of the survey and this subsequent report is to help publishers benchmark their immediate and long-term production and access priorities against their peers and provide a snapshot of the evolution of academy-led publishing programs up to this point in these discrete but related areas of publishing for all stakeholders….”

Posted in oa.business_models, oa.comparisons, oa.gold, oa.journals, oa.metadata, oa.monitoring, oa.new, oa.publishers, oa.reports, oa.scholastica, openaccess | Leave a reply

OA-STRUKTKOMM – Open Access Structured Communication – ScienceOpen

Posted on December 20, 2022 by peter.suber's bookmarks
Reply

Abstract:  Based on the Open access workflow model developed in the predecessor project OA-HVerlag, the research team addressing the question of how data exchange between the systems involved in the workflow can be made more robust and compatible. In this project, the academic approach of a communication structure is being developed. This data transfer container will ensure access to project-specific content and systematize and facilitate the transformation of metadata standards for the distribution of the publication on different platforms. In addition, a toolbox of consulting materials for modelling OA workflows were created and a production system for producing OA monographs was developed.

 

Posted in oa.books, oa.data, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.workflows, openaccess | Leave a reply

Metadata on open access books in BASE – ScienceOpen

Posted on December 20, 2022 by peter.suber's bookmarks
Reply

Abstract:  BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine) is one of the world’s largest search engines for academic documents on the web, with references to around 310 million documents. Cross-system metadata communication and standardization are fundamental prerequisites for the development of BASE and comparable information systems. The presentation focuses on the metadata of open access books and book chapters in BASE, whose share of the total index has increased significantly in recent years, and illustrates the challenge of further dissemination of open access book metadata.

 

Posted in oa.base, oa.books, oa.growth, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.search, oa.standards, openaccess | Leave a reply

Building an archive for scholarly blog posts

Posted on December 12, 2022 by OATP primary
Reply

“This blog post is a follow-up to a post in September (Fenner 2022a), where I announced that I had started working on an archive for scholarly blog posts based on the InvenioRDM open-source repository software. In the last two months, I focussed on two activities – besides lots of physical therapy and other training following a stroke earlier this year (Fenner 2022b): helping to make it easier (and safer) to run InvenioRDM in Docker container infrastructure, and working on converting the bolognese metadata conversion Ruby gem (Fenner 2017) to Python (work in progress on GitHub) to enhance InvenioRDM functionality.

Building an archive of scholarly blog posts faces the same fundamental challenges as repositories for other types of scholarly content, whether data, software, preprints, or journal articles. You have to collect metadata and content, and that approach only scales with standardization and open licenses….”

Posted in oa.blogging, oa.infrastructure, oa.invenio, oa.licensing, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.pids, oa.preservation, oa.repositories, oa.scholcomm, oa.standards, openaccess | Leave a reply

Some of my upcoming projects at Crossref | Martin Paul Eve | Professor of Literature, Technology and Publishing

Posted on December 11, 2022 by OATP primary
Reply

“As I posted a while ago, from January 2023 I will be working at Crossref while retaining my university Professorship. I wanted, here, to outline a few of the projects that I hope to work on once I get started there. I should say upfront: I am afraid there is no time estimate on these and we can’t guarantee to prioritise any particular project. But if there is one that stands out to you, do let me know, as this serves as a useful community gauge….”

Posted in oa.apis, oa.crossref, oa.dois, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.preservation, oa.scholcomm, openaccess | Leave a reply

Open Book Collective now live!

Posted on December 9, 2022 by OATP primary
Reply

We are thrilled to announce the launch today of the Open Book Collective! Visit our site to see our members such as Open Book Publishers, the Directory of Open Acccess Books (DOAB), OAPEN, punctum books, mediastudies.press, meson press, Mattering Press, African Minds, and Thoth.

Librarians can see Open Access initiatives, presses & open infrastructure projects, that can be supported via annual memberships that will help these groups to thrive & also contribute to a fund to assist these groups in further developing & bettering their operations.

Supporting members of the OBC contribute to a more durable ecosystem for the long-term sustainability of OA publishers & open infrastructure developers so critical to Bibliodiversity.

Open Book Collective has been developed by the COPIM project and ScholarLed, generously funded by the Research England Development Fund and Arcadia, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin (grant number 4192).

Visit our website here: http://openbookcollective.org and send any questions or comments to us at: info@openbookcollective.org

 

Posted in oa.academic_led, oa.african_minds, oa.arcadia, oa.books, oa.copim, oa.doab, oa.funding, oa.infrastructure, oa.libraries, oa.mattering_press, oa.mediastudies.press, oa.meson_press, oa.metadata, oa.new, oa.oapen, oa.openbookcollective, oa.openbookpublishers, oa.platforms, oa.publishers, oa.publishing, oa.punctum_books, oa.research_england, oa.scholarled, oa.thoth, openaccess | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Older posts

Search for news

Why should I read this?

Because you are interested in Open Science & Open Access, and need to know how it affects your research (at UMCG). This blog is the largest aggregated news site about Open Science and shows you the latest local, national & international news on Open Science. Contact me for additions/comments: Guus van den Brekel, CMB UMCG

#OPENSCIENCE

#openscience

LieketsengNedAssociate Professor Lieketseng Ned@LieketsengNed·
1h

Excited to join the @PLOSGPH Editorial Board, a new #OpenScience journal for public health research that broadens the range of global perspectives we learn from to advance the health of all humankind.

Twitter 1619115855895314433
LucjabLucja Biel@Lucjab·
1h

Don't miss the latest issue of JoSTrans - simply a must-read!
We are very excited to launch new content type - video essays accompanied by research statements and open peer-reviews as part of our commitment to #openscience!

Twitter 1619115788589498368
JostransTJoSTrans - The Journal of Specialised Translation@JostransT·
1h

It has 7 papers with theoretical, methodological and practical reflections on media accessibility. It marks the launch of new content type: video essays accompanied by research statements and our first open peer-reviews as part of our #openscience commitment!

Twitter 1619115308270354434
Load More...

Dutch Open Science News Alerts

Air France-KLM haalt met 'duurzaamheidsgerichte obligaties' 1 ... - NRC
Kansen noordelijke gemeentes op gebied datagedreven werken ... - Harlinger Courant
Nederlandse inbreng belangrijk bij Vlaamse roep om anti-woke ... - ScienceGuide
ChatGPT brengt ook Hogeschool Rotterdam in rep en roer: 'Geniaal ... - Profielen
Kwart IT'ers werkt bij organisatie die nieuwe technologieën niet op ... - Emerce
Nieuwe wet voor pakjesbezorger op tafel: ook de consument zal het ... - Het Nieuwsblad
Elftal vragen aan… Reitse Sybesma (Maatwerk BV) - FC Groningen

Contributors

  • Comments on: Open Science Community Amsterdam
  • “OA.OPEN_SCIENCE in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
  • #OA.POLICIES in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
  • BMJ Open Science current issue
  • EveryONE PLOS Blog
  • GenR
  • Leibniz Research Alliance Open Science
  • Make Data Count
  • News on Open Science Community Rotterdam
  • OATP primary
  • Open Access actueel
  • Open Science Blog (UoG Library)
  • Open Science Community Groningen
  • Open Science Community Utrecht
  • Open Science Leiden News
  • Open Science Maastricht
  • Open Science Nijmegen
  • Open Science Talk
  • Open Science Talk (Podcast)
  • Open Science Twente
  • openingscience.org
  • Peter Suber’s bookmarks
  • Publish Open Access
  • Replicability-Index
  • Right to Research Coalition – Full Feed
  • SHERPA Services Blog
  • SPARC Europe
  • The 20% Statistician
  • The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics
  • The Journal of Electronic Publishing
  • The OpenScience Project
  • The Scholarly Kitchen
  • ZBW MediaTalk

Open Access Links

  • Open Access at UMCG
  • Open Access at UoG Library
  • Open Access Now
  • OPENACCESS.NL

Open Science Links

  • Dutch Open Science News Alert
  • National Program Open Science (NL)
  • Open Research Calendar
  • Open Science Blog UoG Library & CMB UMCG
  • Open Science Reddit
  • Open Science Talk (Podcast)
  • SPARC EUROPE
  • The OpenScience Project
  • The Scholarly Kitchen

Archives

  • January 2023 (395)
  • December 2022 (382)
  • November 2022 (364)
  • October 2022 (357)
  • September 2022 (263)
  • August 2022 (340)
  • July 2022 (269)
  • June 2022 (370)
  • May 2022 (378)
  • April 2022 (340)
  • March 2022 (444)
  • February 2022 (419)
  • January 2022 (414)
  • December 2021 (313)
  • November 2021 (433)
  • October 2021 (359)
  • September 2021 (292)
  • August 2021 (419)
  • July 2021 (411)
  • June 2021 (402)
  • May 2021 (303)
  • April 2021 (299)
  • March 2021 (358)
  • February 2021 (307)
  • January 2021 (359)
  • December 2020 (283)
  • November 2020 (312)
  • October 2020 (504)
  • September 2020 (264)
  • August 2020 (314)
  • July 2020 (407)
  • June 2020 (332)
  • May 2020 (397)
  • April 2020 (396)
  • March 2020 (368)
  • February 2020 (219)
  • January 2020 (325)
  • December 2019 (253)
  • November 2019 (284)
  • October 2019 (407)
  • September 2019 (253)
  • August 2019 (205)
  • July 2019 (198)
  • June 2019 (258)
  • May 2019 (266)
  • April 2019 (204)
  • March 2019 (238)
  • February 2019 (243)
  • January 2019 (227)
  • December 2018 (187)
  • November 2018 (158)
  • October 2018 (250)
  • September 2018 (156)
  • August 2018 (82)
  • July 2018 (77)
  • June 2018 (85)
  • May 2018 (145)
  • April 2018 (124)
  • March 2018 (72)
  • February 2018 (100)
  • January 2018 (137)
  • December 2017 (127)
  • November 2017 (116)
  • October 2017 (197)
  • September 2017 (141)
  • August 2017 (164)
  • July 2017 (126)
  • June 2017 (172)
  • May 2017 (128)
  • April 2017 (101)
  • March 2017 (162)
  • February 2017 (127)
  • January 2017 (117)
  • December 2016 (133)
  • November 2016 (106)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • September 2016 (93)
  • August 2016 (69)
  • July 2016 (98)
  • June 2016 (61)
  • May 2016 (105)
  • April 2016 (93)
  • March 2016 (77)
  • February 2016 (73)
  • January 2016 (72)
  • December 2015 (104)
  • November 2015 (94)
  • October 2015 (87)
  • September 2015 (88)
  • August 2015 (62)
  • July 2015 (78)
  • June 2015 (52)
  • May 2015 (71)
  • April 2015 (61)
  • March 2015 (52)
  • February 2015 (84)
  • January 2015 (80)
  • December 2014 (68)
  • November 2014 (82)
  • October 2014 (122)
  • September 2014 (77)
  • August 2014 (83)
  • July 2014 (92)
  • June 2014 (80)
  • May 2014 (92)
  • April 2014 (96)
  • March 2014 (113)
  • February 2014 (43)
  • January 2014 (39)
  • December 2013 (52)
  • November 2013 (68)
  • October 2013 (152)
  • September 2013 (80)
  • August 2013 (78)
  • July 2013 (68)
  • June 2013 (45)
  • May 2013 (69)
  • April 2013 (56)
  • March 2013 (82)
  • February 2013 (87)
  • January 2013 (50)
  • December 2012 (43)
  • November 2012 (86)
  • October 2012 (151)
  • September 2012 (84)
  • August 2012 (53)
  • July 2012 (63)
  • June 2012 (58)
  • May 2012 (64)
  • April 2012 (37)
  • March 2012 (72)
  • February 2012 (45)
  • January 2012 (78)
  • December 2011 (56)
  • November 2011 (90)
  • October 2011 (134)
  • September 2011 (73)
  • August 2011 (32)
  • July 2011 (79)
  • June 2011 (153)
  • May 2011 (133)
  • April 2011 (49)
  • March 2011 (164)
  • February 2011 (44)
  • January 2011 (113)
  • December 2010 (60)
  • November 2010 (4)
  • October 2010 (8)
  • September 2010 (33)
  • August 2010 (22)
  • July 2010 (65)
  • June 2010 (45)
  • May 2010 (63)
  • April 2010 (56)
  • March 2010 (79)
  • February 2010 (103)
  • January 2010 (153)
  • December 2009 (151)
  • November 2009 (172)
  • October 2009 (168)
  • September 2009 (180)
  • August 2009 (148)
  • July 2009 (133)
  • June 2009 (373)
  • May 2009 (404)
  • April 2009 (400)
  • March 2009 (529)
  • February 2009 (512)
  • January 2009 (931)
  • December 2008 (536)
  • November 2008 (448)
  • October 2008 (436)
  • September 2008 (311)
  • August 2008 (197)
  • July 2008 (205)
  • June 2008 (31)
  • May 2008 (13)
  • April 2008 (83)
  • March 2008 (1)
  • February 2008 (3)
  • January 2008 (17)
  • December 2007 (3)
  • November 2007 (30)
  • October 2007 (1)
  • September 2007 (2)
  • July 2007 (2)
  • June 2007 (2)
  • May 2007 (4)
  • April 2007 (1)
  • March 2007 (3)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • January 2007 (2)
  • December 2006 (1)
  • November 2006 (2)
  • October 2006 (2)
  • September 2006 (3)
  • June 2006 (3)
  • November 2005 (2)
  • December 1997 (1)
  • September 1997 (1)
  • January 1970 (28)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tags

  • 101
  • authors
  • citation
  • definition
  • editorial best practice
  • editors
  • explained
  • glossary
  • humanities
  • introductions
  • jargon
  • meaning
  • news
  • oa
  • obama
  • od
  • oe
  • oer
  • readership
  • research
  • Wiley Online Library
Proudly powered by WordPress