Reflecting on the Charleston Conference Vendor Showcase @lisalibrarian share what she did — and didn’t — see.
The post Observations from the Charleston Vendor Showcase appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Separately, both open research and AI are considered disrupters, causes of disorder in the normal continuance of scholarly publishing. But approaching them in a synchronized way can offer more productivity gains and efficiencies than taking them on individually.
The post Approaching Artificial Intelligence and Open Research in Sync: Opportunities and Challenges appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Generative AI wants to make information cheap, but will people want to read it? Are we ready for more productive writers?
The post AI Will Lead Us to Need More Garbage-subtraction. appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Today, Alice Meadows and Roger Schonfeld introduce a new interview series – Kitchen Essentials – featuring leaders of some of the key scholarly infrastructure organizations globally.
The post Introducing Kitchen Essentials — Interviews with the Scholarly Infrastructure Community appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Functional silos lead to customer data silos. Can you get a full view of customer engagement without re-architecting your whole organization?
The post Can You Really Know Your Customer If You Only See Them One Silo At A Time? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
A report of the Chef’s panel on AI, Open content, and research integrity during the Frankfurt Book Fair.
The post Chefs Panel Discusses AI, Integrity and Open Content in Frankfurt appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Some beautiful winners in this year’s Nikon Small World in Motion video microscopy competition.
The post This Year’s Nikon Small World in Motion Video Microscopy Winners appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
With yet another stumble from Twitter/X, Angela Cochran looks at the numbers and asks whether all the efforts journals have put into building and maintaining journal Twitter accounts have been worth it.
The post Worth the Time? A Critical Look at the Value of Twitter for Journals appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Julie Zhu reflects on the IEEE’s journey with the Open Discovery Initiative (ODI) and the benefits of ODI conformance statements.
The post Guest Post — Reflecting on a Decade with the Open Discovery Initiative: Insights from IEEE appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Are there enough reviewers though to meet demand and is the peer review process efficient enough to handle the sheer volume of papers being published? How can a combination of human expertise and AI make the peer review process more efficient?
The post The Peer Review Renaissance: An Urgent Call for Transformation appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Robert Harington provides a template for scholarly societies wondering how to grapple with the overwhelming and omnipresent prospect of an AI future.
The post AI and Scholarly Societies appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
The role of libraries and archives as streaming grows, choice declines, and the death of the red envelopes arrives.
The post Libraries, Archives, Choice and Red Envelopes: The Growth of Streaming, the Decline of Choice, and the Death of the Red Envelope appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
In 2023, AI has been back in the news in a big way. Large Language Models and ChatGPT threatened our’s and many other industries with huge disruption. As with so many threatened techno-shocks, a large degree of this one was hype, but what will happen after the hype fades. What, if anything, will be the lasting legacy of ChatGPT?
The post GPT, Large Language Models, and the Trough of Disillusionment appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
A panel attending the 2023 AUPresses Meeting hosted a conversation about optimizing books metadata and measuring its impact on search experiences in the mainstream web.
The post Measuring Metadata Impacts on Discoverability: A Conversation at the 2023 AUPresses Meeting appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Human-dependent peer review is inequitable, suffers from injustice, and is potentially unsustainable. Here’s why we should replace it (eventually) with AI-based peer review.
The post Ending Human-Dependent Peer Review appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.