Project MUSE to Re-Launch Enhanced Journal Hosting Service – peter.suber@gmail.com – Gmail

“Project MUSE is pleased to announce expanded and enhanced journal hosting services for 2021. Originally introduced in 2015, MUSE’s hosting service has provided an option for publishers to place journals on the MUSE platform outside of its renowned Journal Collections Program….

The changes to the program result directly from consultation with both current client publishers and prospective participants, in an effort to assess the 5-year-old program. “We’re thrilled that publishers are already responding enthusiastically,” said Kelley Squazzo, Director of Publisher Relations and Content Development for Project MUSE, of the re-tooled program. “I’m especially excited for the opportunity to grow our MUSE Open program with more open access (OA) journals.” Project MUSE anticipates a number of new OA journals to launch in 2021….”

How flipping a journal became about more than just open access – Digital Scholarship @ Leiden

“On January 14, 2019 the entire editorial board of Elsevier’s Journal of Informetrics (JOI) resigned. The editorial board wanted a journal with the same scope and same scientific standards, but owned by the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) (and not by the publisher), open access (instead of toll access) and with open citations. That is why, after resigning from JOI, they launched the new journal Quantitative Science Studies (QSS) with MIT Press [see news of the resignations and launch of the journal at the CWTS website and ISSI website respectively]. MIT Press participates in the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC).

I interviewed Ludo Waltman (professor of Quantitative Science Studies and deputy director at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University) and Paul Wouters (Dean of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, former director of CWTS and Open Science Coordinator at Leiden University) about the reasons for their decision and their views on the future of scholarly communication in general. …”