Why are national PID strategies having a moment, and why should you care? Find out in today’s post by Alice Meadows.
The post Why PID Strategies Are Having A Moment — And Why You Should Care appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Research bureaucracy and administrative burden has become so overpowering that many researchers are reporting that they don’t have time to do any research anymore. Phill Jones argues that technology in the form of PIDs will go a long way to fixing this.
The post Unnecessary Research Bureaucracy is Killing Academic Productivity, But it IS Fixable appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Funder guidance is too vague when it comes to identifiers and metadata. It needs to get specific to be effective.
The post We All Know What We Mean, Can We Just Put It In The Policy? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
In the light of CCCs acquisition of Ringgold last week, three Chefs, Phill Jones, Roger Schonfeld, and Todd Carpenter reflect on the motivations for the move and its implications for PIDs and organisational identifiers.
The post Is Infrastructure Consolidation the Next Step? CCC Acquires Ringgold appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Today’s post is the first of two in which we look at the state of persistent identifiers and what they mean for publishers—to coincide with the first meeting, on June 21, of the new UK Research Identifier National Coordinating Council (RINCC) and publication the same day of a Cost Benefit Analysis Report, funded by the UK Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) for Open Access project.
The post Why Publishers Should Care About Persistent Identifiers appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.