Why are national PID strategies having a moment, and why should you care? Find out in today’s post by Alice Meadows.
The post Why PID Strategies Are Having A Moment — And Why You Should Care appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Research bureaucracy and administrative burden has become so overpowering that many researchers are reporting that they don’t have time to do any research anymore. Phill Jones argues that technology in the form of PIDs will go a long way to fixing this.
The post Unnecessary Research Bureaucracy is Killing Academic Productivity, But it IS Fixable appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Funder guidance is too vague when it comes to identifiers and metadata. It needs to get specific to be effective.
The post We All Know What We Mean, Can We Just Put It In The Policy? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
In the light of CCCs acquisition of Ringgold last week, three Chefs, Phill Jones, Roger Schonfeld, and Todd Carpenter reflect on the motivations for the move and its implications for PIDs and organisational identifiers.
The post Is Infrastructure Consolidation the Next Step? CCC Acquires Ringgold appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
To round off Peer Review Week 2021, Phill Jones and Alice Meadows share work under way to map out a PID-optimized workflow for peer review – and invite your feedback!
The post PIDs for Peer Review! appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
In the second of two posts on persistent identifiers in scholarly communications, Phill Jones and Alice Meadows share information about a new cost-benefit analysis showing the value of widespread PID adoption
The post Making the Case for a PID-Optimized World appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.