Revisiting a post from 2017: Several services aim to gather all publications comprehensively. Who has all the content?
The post Revisiting: Who Has All The Content? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Revisiting a post from 2017: Several services aim to gather all publications comprehensively. Who has all the content?
The post Revisiting: Who Has All The Content? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
An SSP Meeting Session showing the results from publisher partnerships with Researchgate suggest the company is shifting from a source of potential infringement to a distribution channel that is being folded into more and more organizations.
The post Going Legit Part 2: The Continuing Path from Piracy to Partnership appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
According to ResearchGate, the academic social networking site, their RG Score is “a new way to measure your scientific reputation”. With such high aims, Peter Kraker, Katy Jordan and Elisabeth Lex take a closer look at the opaque metric. By reverse engineering the score, they find that a significant weight is linked to ‘impact points’ – a similar metric to the widely discredited journal impact factor. Transparency in metrics is the only way scholarly measures can be put into context and the only way biases – which are inherent in all socially created metrics – can be uncovered.