Human-dependent peer review is inequitable, suffers from injustice, and is potentially unsustainable. Here’s why we should replace it (eventually) with AI-based peer review.
How do we strike a balance between humans and AI to improve peer review? We’ve interviewed a few publishing experts who specialize in human and AI ethical, equitable, and sustainable publishing solutions to share their thoughts on the future of peer review.
In today’s post Alice Meadows, Jasmine Wallace, and Karin Wulf kick off a week of posts to celebrate Peer Review Week 2023 with their thoughts on peer review and the future of publishing.
The post Reflections on Peer Review and the Humane Future of Publishing appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
How machines learn, as demonstrated by a pile of matchboxes playing tic-tac-toe.
The post The Best Explanation I’ve Seen for How Machine Learning Works appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Was a recent Scholarly Kitchen piece analyzing the capabilities of ChatGPT a fair test? What happens if you run a similar test with an improved prompt on LLMs that are internet connected and up to date?
To identify both benefits and risks of generative AI for our industry, we tested ChatGPT and Google Bard for authoring, for submission and reviews, for publishing, and for discovery and dissemination.
In this article, Minhaj Rain explores how human intelligence tasks (HITs) and not simply more AI tools could be the way forward as a reliable and scalable solution for maintaining research integrity within the scholarly record.
The post Guest Post — Are HIT-backed AI Research Integrity Solutions the Need of the Hour? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
An update on how generative AI has progressed and how it has been applied to research publishing processes since ChatGPT was released, looking at business, application, technology, and ethical aspects of generative AI.
The post The Intelligence Revolution: What’s Happening and What’s to Come in Generative AI appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Peer Review Week is an annual global event exploring and celebrating the essential role of peer review. This year’s Peer Review Week theme is “Peer Review and the Future of Publishing.”
The post Guest Post — Peer Review Week 2023 to Focus on Peer Review and the Future of Publishing appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
The AI takeover isn’t all doom and gloom. Finally, a long running musical question can be answered.
The post Finally Some Positive AI News: Elvis Meets Sir Mix-a-Lot appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
The current uproar over artificial intelligence does not show us what the future of AI will look like, but rather how a human population falls into predictable patterns as it contemplates any new development: we are observing not AI but ourselves observing AI.
The post Who Is Going to Make Money from Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Communications? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Will artificial intelligence fatally undermine the integrity of scholarly publishing? A formal debate from the annual meeting of the Society for Scholarly Publishing.
The post SSP Conference Debate: AI and the Integrity of Scholarly Publishing appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
The Supreme Court has ruled in the Andy Warhol–Prince fair use case. What does this mean for scholarly communications, and the reuse of materials for AI training?