Another “mixed bag” post from us — Is it time to leave Twitter? How can we incentivize journals and authors to take up open science practices? What is “involution” and is DEIA the solution?
Smorgasbord: Twitter v. Mastodon; Incentivizing Open Science; DEI v. Involution appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Posted in Accessibility, author fees, China, content moderation, DEI, deia, diversity, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility, Elon Musk, equity, incentives, Inclusion, Infrastructure, involution, Mastodon, Metrics and Analytics, open science, openaccess, research, Social Media, Social Role, sociology, Twitter, World of Tomorrow |
A new type of post from us today, offering a smorgasbord of opinions on topics including the ongoing Twitter/Elon Musk saga, just what “equitable access” to the literature means, the ongoing lack of experimental controls in one area of bibliometric analysis, and whether journals are more like a gate or a sewer.
Smorgasbord: A Better Metaphor for Publishing, Twitter/Musk, Equitable Access, and Those Vexing OACA Experimental Controls appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
Posted in Accessibility, Authority, citation advantage, Controversial Topics, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility, Elon Musk, equity, ethics, experimental controls, free speech, Infrastructure, Metrics and Analytics, OACA, Open Access, openaccess, research, Social Media, technology, Tools, Twitter |
Today’s guest post, by Simon Holt and Erin Osborne-Martin, is the first of two looking at the experiences of people with disabilities in scholarly publishing (the second will be published tomorrow).
Some Perspectives on Disability Disclosure in the Publishing Industry appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.