Fun(d) with Science

Many researchers will tell you that financing their work–writing grants, securing funding, and budgeting for varying funding levels year to year–is the least rewarding part of life in academia, but there’s no escaping the simple fact that science costs money. … Continue reading »

The post Fun(d) with Science appeared first on EveryONE.

SHERPA Services Blog 2015-04-30 15:35:50

RoMEO

Added new publishers:

Publisher RoMEO Colour Date Added
Asociacion Didactica Andalucia (Didactic Association Andalucia) Blue 23-April-2015
Geozon Science Media Green 23-April-2015
International Archives of Integrated Medicine Green 23-April-2015
Universitatea de ?tiin?e Agronomice si Medicina Veterinara – Bucure?ti (University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest) Green 27-April-2015
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, UMR LAVUE 7218, Laboratoire Mosaïques Green 23-April-2015
University of Victoria Blue 23-April-2015

 

Total publishers: 1830 [27/4/15]

Exceptions: 261 [27/4/15]

 

Updated entries

Publisher Update Date Updated
Alcohol Research Documentation Policy and Paid OA URLs 09-April-2015
AlphaMed Press Updated policy and policy links 08-April-2015
AlphaMed Press Updated policy and policy website 22-April-2015
AlphaMed Press: Stem Cells AlphaMed Press: Oncologist. Updated policy 22-April-2015
AlphaMed Press: Stem Cells Translational Medicine AlphaMed Press: Stem Cells; Updated policy and move SCTM to main AlphaMed Press policy as no longer open access 08-April-2015
American Mathematical Society Updated policy removing use of PDF 10-April-2015
American Society of Civil Engineers Paid OA URL 09-April-2015
Brill Updated policy URL 29-April-2015
Cochrane Collaboration Updated policy and policy links 10-April-2015
Duke University Press Updated deposit locations 08-April-2015
George Thieme Verlag Clarified use of Publisher’s version/PDF 14-April-2015
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia Removal of embargo period; White to Blue 01-April-2015
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc Updated policy and policy links 08-April-2015
Mary Ann Liebert: BioResearch Open Access Paid OA URL 09-April-2015
Medizinverlage Stuttgart Clarified use of Publisher’s version/PDF 14-April-2015
OMICS Publishing Group Name changed to OMICS International 28-April-2015
PNG Publications Policy and Paid OA URLs 09-April-2015
Royal College of Psychiatrists Paid OA URL 09-April-2015
Royal College of Psychiatrists Policy URLs 21-April-2015
Royal Society, The Removal of general embargo period. Embargo period remains for Institutional Repository Deposit. Yellow to Green 21-April-2015
Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft Paid OA URL 10-April-2015
Socrates Updated policy. Green to Yellow 22-April-2015
Thieme Publishing Clarified use of Publisher’s version/PDF 14-April-2015
TU Delft, Faculteit Bouwkunde Updated policy url and CC-BY version 22-April-2015
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Removed embargo period; added OA status 29-April-2015
Università di Bologna Name change to Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna (University of Bologna) 22-April-2015

 

Journal Exceptions

Parent Exception Date
AlphaMed Press STEM CELLS Translational Medicine 22-April-2015

 

 

JULIET

Funding Agency Date Added
US Department of Defense 20-April-2015

 

Funding Agency Update Date Updated
Action on Hearing Loss Policy URL 10-April-2015
Age UK Main URL 10-April-2015
Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement Policy URL 09-April-2015
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Policy URL 09-April-2015
CERN Policy URLs and added Data policy and urls 10-April-2015
Marie Curie Cancer Care Policy URL 09-April-2015
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond Policy URL and Policy Reviewed 20-April-2015

 

Biodiversity Heritage Library

“The Biodiversity Heritage Library improves research methodology by collaboratively making biodiversity literature openly available to the world as part of a global biodiversity community. BHL also serves as the foundational literature component of the Encyclopedia of Life…

LIBER seeks Advocacy Officer

“LIBER is seeking an Advocacy Officer to work on our European projects relating to policy and advocacy and to support the Executive Director in developing our advocacy programme. The post-holder will work on advocacy and policy in the areas of copyright and text and data mining, open access, and research data management….”

CDRS is looking for summer and fall interns

“Calling all library school students! CDRS [Columbia University’s Center for Digital Research and Scholarship] is an organization that is dedicated to being leaders and innovators in providing equitable access to and participation in the scholarly conversation through openness, partnerships, and community collaborations. We have a limited number of internship opportunities available, and are searching for students interested in working with us to increase the efficacy and impact of scholarship and research in a more inclusive and integrated scholarly communication ecosystem through the use of multiple technologies and media.

Applications are welcome from students in LIS programs with project proposals that explore effective systems for creating, distributing, and preserving digital scholarly content….”

Global Collaboration to Fight Malaria – YouTube

Abstract:  At least one child dies of malaria every minute of every day, mainly in Africa and Asia. According to Matthew Todd, who leads the Open Source Malaria Consortium in Sydney, Australia, given minimal financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies to develop new treatments and a high degree of suffering among the affected communities, a large-scale collaborative research model provides a solution. Todd turned publicly available data into a global effort to help identify new anti-malaria drugs. He did this by creating an open-source collaborative involving scientists, college students and others from around the world. They use open online laboratory notebooks in which their experimental data is posted each day, enabling instant sharing and the ability to build on others’ findings in almost real time. Todd’s Malaria Consortium could provide a model for researchers collaboratively tackling other daunting medical challenges, such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access

Abstract:  This paper makes the strong, fact-based case for a large-scale transformation of the current corpus of scientific subscription journals to an open access business model. The existing journals, with their well-tested functionalities, should be retained and developed to meet the demands of 21st century research, while the underlying payment streams undergo a major restructuring. There is sufficient momentum for this decisive push towards open access publishing. The diverse existing initiatives must be coordinated so as to converge on this clear goal. The international nature of research implies that this transformation will be achieved on a truly global scale only through a consensus of the world’s most eminent research organizations. All the indications are that the money already invested in the research publishing system is sufficient to enable a transformation that will be sustainable for the future. There needs to be a shared understanding that the money currently locked in the journal subscription system must be withdrawn and re-purposed for open access publishing services. The current library acquisition budgets are the ultimate reservoir for enabling the transformation without financial or other risks. The goal is to preserve the established service levels provided by publishers that are still requested by researchers, while redefining and reorganizing the necessary payment streams. By disrupting the underlying business model, the viability of journal publishing can be preserved and put on a solid footing for the scholarly developments of the future.

The new Max Planck Gesellschaft report on the large-scale transition to OA

“I’m glad to see this new Max Planck Gesellschaft report on the large-scale transition to OA, and I’m adding it to the list of works to cover in the new Harvard literature review <osc.hul.harvard.edu/journal-flipping> on converting non-OA journals to OA.

But I’m sorry to see that the announcement of the report uses its short space to broadcast two false assumptions — first, that all or most OA journals charge publication fees (also known as article processing charges or APCs), and second that all or most of the fees at fee-based OA journals are paid by authors. I haven’t read the report itself yet, but I hope it shows better understanding than the announcement.”

EuRegMe 2015

 Find yourself wanting more after the workshop? Here you can the slides, resources and more! 

How you can help

 

More Information and Contact details

If you’d like to get in touch and discuss anything please feel free. Just email me at Joe [AT] RightToResearch [DOT] org

Want to stay up to date? 

Do it quickly and simply by signing up the the Student Statement on the Right to Research! This lets us know you believe in Open Access, and we’ll keep you up to date with big news and important actions. 

Also, follow us on twitterlike us on Facebook, check us out on LinkedinYoutube and yes, even Google+

Give us some feedback!

A case for strong fair use / fair dealing with restrictive licenses for reuse in scholarship

The types of works that many students and faculty would like to be able to include in scholarly works are not necessarily from other scholarly works. For example, scholars in my doctoral discipline of communication study a wide range of types of works including newspapers, television, films, cartoons, advertising, blogs and social media, and public relations materials. It is very useful for scholars to be able to include images and text from the primary source materials, either as illustration or for purposes of critique. Obtaining permission to use even small excerpts of such works is time-consuming at best. I argue that it would be in the best interests of scholarship to advocate for strong fair use / fair dealing exceptions for research and academic critique globally and accept that more restrictive licenses may be necessary to avoid the potential for re-use errors that could easily occur with blanket licenses allowing broad re-use. For example, while it makes sense to allow scholars to include small movie stills in an academic piece, it could be quite problematic for scholars to include such items in works that grant blanket commercial and re-use rights downstream.

This illustrates what I see as one of the problems with the one size fits all CC-BY license preferred by some open access advocates (which I consider to be a serious error): what I interpret as an implicit assumption that all of the works scholars are likely to want to re-use are other scholarly works. Rather than making assumptions, let’s do some research to find out what scholars and students would like to be able to re-use. Anecdotally, in my experience the most popular items for re-use are images from popular culture (especially characters from the Simpsons TV series), not scholarly works. Scholarly journals like to use photos to add interest and aesthetic value. If it is the case that the greatest interest in re-use for scholars involves works from popular culture / outside the academy, then ubiquitous CC-BY licenses for absolutely every scholarly article, book, and dataset in the whole world would not solve the primary re-use question for a majority of scholars.

This is not meant to suggest that advocacy for global fair use / fair dealing rights for academic research and critique is an easy task, rather to raise the question of whether this is an appropriate and useful goal for scholarly works.

This post is part of the Creative Commons and Open Access Critique series.

UAEM EU Conference

 Find yourself wanting more after the workshop? Here you can the slides, resources and more! 

How you can help

 

More Information and Contact details

If you’d like to get in touch and discuss anything please feel free. Just email me at Joe [AT] RightToResearch [DOT] org

Want to stay up to date? 

Do it quickly and simply by signing up the the Student Statement on the Right to Research! This lets us know you believe in Open Access, and we’ll keep you up to date with big news and important actions. 

Also, follow us on twitterlike us on Facebook, check us out on LinkedinYoutube and yes, even Google+

Give us some feedback!

Guidelines for the Professional Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in History, American Historical Association Ad Hoc Committee on Professional Evaluation of Digital Scholarship by Historians, April 2015 Draft

“Some scholars may seek to incubate genuinely new approaches to historical reasoning. Those

strategies might include new digital short-form genres such as blogs, social media or multimedia
storytelling, participating in strong activist forms of open-access distribution of scholarly work,
or creating digital platforms and tools as alternative modalities of scholarly production.
Wherever possible, historians should be ready to explore and consider new modes and forms of
intellectual work within the discipline and to expand their understanding of what constitutes the
discipline accordingly. The shared commitment of all historians to the informed and evidence-based
conversation that is history can smooth our discipline’s integration of new possibilities.
With agreement on the purpose of our work, new and varying forms of that work can be seen as

a strength rather than an impediment….”

Marketing Manager – Open Research

“Nature Publishing Group are recruiting a Marketing Manager to join its Open Research team.

 

The Marketing Manager, Open Research, is responsible for the planning and implementation of the marketing plans for two of Nature Publishing Group’s open access titles, Scientific Data and Scientific Reports- the largest and fastest growing title within the portfolio. The role will also involve wider support of the departments open access initiatives….”