In response to the BIS Select Committee Report Dame Janet Finch writes:
Dame Janet Finch: “There are some unfortunate gaps in the Select Committee?s consideration. In particular their comments on the publishing industry take no account of a [sic] Learned Societies, whose publishing and other roles have been a major concern of our working group.”
1. that the Green OA deposit in the institutional repository should be immediate rather than delayed, whether or not Open Access to the deposit is embargoed by the publisher (during any OA embargo the repository’s eprint-request Button can then enable the author to fulfill individual user eprint requests automatically with one click each if deposit was immediate),
2. that an effective mechanism for monitoring and ensuring timely mandate compliance should be implemented, and
3. that Gold OA publishing should either no longer be preferred or hybrid Gold should no longer be funded.
It is not at all clear how this amounts to “tak[ing] no account of a [sic] Learned Societies, whose publishing and other roles have been a major concern of our working group.”
The Report does recommend shorter limits on the maximum allowable publisher embargo on OA, but that has no bearing whatsoever on the substantive recommendations above, which refer to the mandatory date of deposit, not to the date on which the deposit is made OA.