web analytics
Skip to primary content

About Open Science

(All that comes with it, (but not by itself)

About Open Science

Main menu

  • Home
  • Open Science at UMCG & RUG
  • Open Science Community Groningen
  • Data
  • About

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

How Journals and Publishers Can Help to Reform Research Assessment – Science Editor

Posted on May 3, 2019 by peter.suber's bookmarks

“…

  1. Cease the promotion of journal impact factors (ref)5
  2. Provide article metrics and indicators (ref)33
  3. Adopt the CRediT taxonomy for author contributions (ref)33
  4. Ensure that all reference data deposited with Crossref is open (ref)26
  5. Require authors to make all key data available according to FAIR principles (ref)19
  6. Follow the data citation principles (ref)17
  7. Encourage the use of unique identifiers (eg RRIDs; ref)18
  8. Require authors to use ORCIDs (ref)25
  9. Publish peer review reports and author responses along with the article (ref)21
  10. Examine ways to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in the publishing process (ref)31 …”
This entry was posted in oa.advocacy, oa.assessment, oa.dora, oa.fair, oa.gold, oa.impactstory, oa.jif, oa.journals, oa.metadata, oa.metrics, oa.new, oa.orcid, oa.prestige, oa.publishers, openaccess by peter.suber's bookmarks. Bookmark the permalink.
Proudly powered by WordPress